Purpose of this page: Communicate expectations for scholarship (= citing
your sources).
See also
Avoiding
Plagiarism, from the the Purdue
University Online Writing Lab
MU College of Engineering Policy
on Academic Dishonesty
William Pfeiffer, Technical Writing: A Practical
Approach, Fourth edition, Prentice Hall, 2000. Chapter 13 Technical Research
Best
Practices: Intellectual Property or What
may I use from copyright games?
In any scholarly writing, it should be clear to whom each idea belongs. We
often say jokingly, "It cannot be plagiarism if you credit your sources." Your
employer will expect you to construct answers as rapidly and carefully as possible,
and finding the answer somewhere is often the best way. However, when you do
so, it is important that your reader be able to tell which ideas are yours,
which belong to someone else, and to whom the other ideas belong. It is wrong
to give the impression, even implicitly, that someone else's work is really
your own.
When I say a paragraph like that of vague generalities at home, my kids turn
to my wife and say, "Could you translate that into English for us?"
Translation. In any work that you do, it should be clear to your reader which
ideas are yours, and which came from someone else. If the idea came from someone
else, it should be clear to your reader where to go to read the original. The
two most common methods of doing that in the mathematical sciences literature
are
- List of references at the end with pointers in the text to the references
[1]
- Bibliographic information in parentheses
Bibliographic information, whether in the reference list or in parenthetical
remarks, should be complete enough to allow the reader to find the cited work.
The exact form depends on the nature of the work cited. See MAA, AMS, ACM, SIAM
publications for models. Include author(s), title, publisher, year, pages, URL.
For example,
Jennifer Niederst with Edie Freedman,
Designing for the Web: Getting Started in a New Medium,
1st Edition April 1996, O'Reilly.
How should you format references? One excellent source is the MLA Manual of Style,
see owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/research/r_mla.html
You should refer to our text. You are welcome to use other materials, especially
the literature you are assigned to read. You are encouraged to discuss your
answers with your friends, classmates, or with me. You are expected to write
your own assignments, and you should state clearly the sources of ideas that
you copied, read, or heard. Include bibliographic citations when appropriate.
If a solution represents the joint work of several class members, you should
say say so.
Why Do We Cite Sources?
Different cultures have different traditions about intellectual property. Our
tradition holds strongly to a tradition of personal ownership. If you create
something, what you create belongs to you. You have the right to control how
it is used. You can sell it, give it away, or allow restricted use as you wish.
You do not want to let others use your work without your permission. It follows
that
you cannot use their work without their permission.
Citing the source of your ideas add, not subtracts, from your credibility.
You have told your reader that you have done your homework by being familiar
with relevant literature, so you should know what you are talking about. You
also let your reader know that the cited information comes from someone who
may be more expert than you, and that it has been validated by a peer review
process.
Citing your sources is also a matter of justice for the original authors.
The writer of a song or a movie receives a royalty each time the work is performed
as payment for the creative effort. Scientists are not paid that way (fortunately,
or we would be hungry). One small payment we receive is when someone acknowledges
finding something useful in what we have written. Your citation pays me, while
costing you nothing. Good deal, no?
Citing your sources also reflects your own self-interest. During your career,
you will be a net creator of intellectual property. You trust that you will
be paid, rewarded, cited, etc. by people using YOUR work. You should treat
the work of others as you expect others to treat your work.
If I took one of your homework assignments, put my name on it, and published
it as a journal article or sold it to a consulting client, you would be justifiable
offended, no? Other creators of intellectual property feel the same. Give them
credit where credit is due.
Add Value
Sometimes it seems that students in my classes pass through several stages of
realization:
- I must write.
- I must write English.
- The easiest way to do that appears to be to copy it from somewhere.
- I am expected to list my sources, so I list them at the end.
- I must make clear who said what, so I cite a reference for each paragraph
or section.
- I must add value. If your boss finds it more helpful to have the references
you listed than to have your report, why should she employ YOU? You add value
to the reference material by summarizing, drawing connections, offering suggestions,
and sorting through large amounts to point out the truly relevant portions.
See also ACM Code of
Ethics includes clause 1.6 Give proper credit for intellectual property.
|