Skip to Content
 
Logo of Marquette University BIEN 167 Module 3 Telerehabilitation

Perspectives on a Tele-Encounter

Outline History Univ Tele-Access Models Technologies Telerehab
Part 1 (History): | Univ Access | Telecom Access | Tele-Encounter | Tele-Interface Design |

There are several perspectives from which to view a teleconferencing session, and from which to evaluate the effectiveness of a tele-encounter:

  • From one perspective, the aim is to establish the illusion of telepresence: the sense that others are "virtually present" through "window," thus enabling an effective tele-encounter. From this perspective, the aim is to use the highest bandwidth possible, and to design an environment where the video and audio transmission is so realistic that users feel they are sharing the same space, and even forget that technology is involved in creating the illusion.
  • From an alternative perspective, the aim is to enable remote access to information and services. Here effectiveness is based the the ability of participants to accomplish the desired objectives for the tele-encounter, most specifically as related to the effectiveness of modes of communication. The illusion of "telepresence" in not required as long as aims are achieved.
  • From a task-oriented "systems" perspective, a human-technology-human connection (that includes human-technology interfaces) is established, including human-technology interfaces. This tele-encounter aims to accomplished a sequence of tasks within a tele-encounter, such as teleconsultation, telesupport, teleassessment, or teletherapy.

From the above, we see that teleconferencing can take many forms, ranging from a simple mobile phone call that could occur in many contexts, to a high-bandwidth videoconference between rooms designed for such conference calls. planned end videoconferencing system.

This section targets videoconferencing systems that include support for video and well as audio. Our primary focus will be on technical aspects, especially through looking at videoconferencing standards.

First, however, we develop a foundation by classifying videoconferencing environments into four types:

  • Room (group) systems. Controlled environment for group conferencing video (controlled lighting, color scheme, camera locations, multiple monitors), audio (planned acoustics, audio mixing), other conferencing media (e.g., document camera, computer).
  • Rollabout systems. Movable system (including camera, monitor, microphone) on a cart, for intended for both group and individual teleencounters. Local environment is typically less controlled (e.g., lighting, acoustics), and typically just one camera, monitor and microphone.
  • Desktop systems. Huge variety of systems, ranging from videophones with a small 4"x3" screen that is integrated with a phoneset to settop boxes that sit on TV monitors to computer desktop systems. Includes systems supporting all of the videoconferencing standards.
  • Mobile systems. Cell phone and PDA (personal digital systems) such as PocketPC. Typically video is QCIF (176x144 pixels) or less.

One can also look as systems from the perspective of their " ...abilities":

  • accessibility/usability: These have been defined previously. Access through minimization of the barrier of distance is a fundamental motivation behind telehealth, and was discussed previously in our section on universal access. The usability of telehealth features for individuals with diverse abilities has not be systematically evaluated, although we have an ongoing study addressing this need (PI on project: Jason Foil). In practise, there are many alternatives that related to changing control settings, implementation of audio and video.
  • interoperability: Interoperability is a key motivation behind vidoconferencing standards. It is our experience with videoconferencing that there are degrees of interoperability: marginally interoperable implies that it is possible for products to interoperate, but takes significant expertise to achieve connection and/or quality (e.g., of sound, video) diminishes significantly below expectations once connected, which truly interoperable means that the products readily connect or communicate without degradation in performance in measures related to the standard.
  • reliability: It is often said that reliability is the single most important factor is determining whether telehealth technology is used or abandoned (and thus the growth rate of the field of telehealth). There are also shades of gray that relate to reliability. Indeed, for our H.323 and H.324 product evaluation studies, the experienced researcher can "say" which products have been found to be reliable; yet it is difficult to come up with objective measures. Sometimes the connection is lost, other times the quality temporarily degrades.
  • scalability/flexibility: A ability to change and adjust, for instance to more terminals, changes in bandwidth allocation, product upgrades, etc.

 

| Telerehab Outline || Univ Access | Telecom Access | Tele-Encounter | Tele-Interface Design |

©2003-2004 Jack Winters ... BIEN 167 Home